School prayer gets a boost

House approves bill that would let students express faith on campus.
Howard and Christian
Texas Rep. Charlie Howard, R-Sugar Land, left, talks with Rep. Wayne Christian, R-Center, right, in the House chamber in Austin. Lawmakers debated Howard’s legislation that would encourage schools to adopt policy making it easier for students to voluntarily pray without fear of legal repercussions.

By GARY SCHARRER
Houston Chronicle

May 1, 2007 – The Scrooge Report Post

AUSTIN, Texas — Legislation designed to give public school students opportunities to express religious viewpoints tentatively cleared the House on Monday despite warnings that it will have unintended consequences.

The bill would require school districts to adopt a policy allowing student speakers to express a religious perspective during limited public forums, such as football games, graduation ceremonies and school assemblies.

“This bill provides protection for students and school officials. Right now we have confusion in the schools about religious expression, and students are being discriminated against,” said Rep. Charlie Howard, R-Sugar Land, author of House Bill 3678.

Current law allows students to organize prayer groups, religious clubs and similar gatherings during the school day, and they must be given the same access to school facilities as other noncurricular groups.

Howard said his bill does not give students any new rights or take any away. But critics contend the expansion of student prayer at football games and other school-related activities would raise constitutional questions.

A separate bill that would make it easier for school districts to offer courses in the Bible is expected to reach the House floor soon.

The House voted 110-33 for the “Schoolchildren’s Religious Liberties Act.” The legislation will head to the Senate for consideration after a final House vote today.

Read Full Story

4 thoughts on “School prayer gets a boost

  1. Protection for the right to express one’s views is “overstepping boundaries”? Not sure I see your point.

  2. Hi alexander,
    sorry I wasn’t clear. It’s fine to express your views, I agree with you. The boundaries I was referring to are separation of church and state. Remember, the separation was designed to protect the church from the state, not the other way around.

  3. The separation was created so that religious leaders would not impose religious laws on the country. Europeans who came here did not want to see religious monarchies as what had occured in their home countries. They were fed up with religious oppression.

    However, religion and one’s personal belief are two separate things. It was NOT established to impose on anyone’s right to express their beliefs.

    This is what those that are afraid of “religious” expression don’t understand…it’s not really about establishing “religion” in schools…its about the free expression of personal beliefs.

    As a Christian, you should not that it’s not about religion…its about a personal relationship with Him.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s